Winter is finally fading away as we approach the final British springtime of the decade, and fittingly, April was a month of transition for me: I spent a good chunk of it getting ready for things that’ll be happening in May.
For a start, my book on The Mummy is scheduled to be published at the end of May, so that’s something for me to look forward to. I’m still gearing up for the Midnight Widows crowdfunding campaign, and May is still looking to be a viable date. I’ve also had a short story accepted for an anthology, but I won’t be able to go into detail until the formal announcement in — yes — May.
So, I’m pretty eager to see May roll around. As for April, well, I got a few things done…
Articles of mine published elsewhere this month:
Article topics for May and beyond:
The latest post in my Amazing Stories retrospective is now live; this time I’m looking at the April 1928 issue, which includes a rather marvellous story called “The Yeast Men” (a fitting alternate title would be… DOUGHLEMS).
This issue marks the magazine’s second anniversary; I’ve now covered two whole years of this pioneering publication, and two thirds of Hugo Gernsback’s run as editor. Bit of a milestone…
Continuing one-story-per-decade overview of vampire literature is still flapping about over at WWAC. This month I’m covering the 1870s and 1880s, which involves looking at one all-time classic and one long-forgotten also-ran.
Phew — the series is only one third finished and I’ve already crossed the 12,000-word mark!
My review of Shazam! is up at Ms en Scene, and I had a rollicking good time!
A few times now I’ve butted heads with a chap named Brian Niemeier, a hard-right indie sci-fi author who believes that demons are turning people into Marxists. I’ve recently seen the topic of Niemeier cropping up in the blogosphere once more; these discussions have focused mainly on his religio-political views, but I’d like to take the opportunity to point out a grave ethical lapse he’s made as an author: he has lent support to a known plagiarist.
Now, this isn’t exactly news. I mentioned the subject in passing back in 2017, but I didn’t go into detail. With this post, I hope to make the case clearer.
First, let me introduce the plagiarist who Niemeier supports. His name is Douglas S. Taylor and he runs a one-man publishing company called DarcWorX. Taylor has committed literally dozens of acts of plagiarism by using copyrighted artwork without permission on book covers, publicity material and merchandise. I’ve already written in detail about my experiences with Taylor, but if you don’t have time to read that, here are a few samples of Taylor’s theft:
Continue reading “The Demonologist and the Thief”
My latest review at WWAC takes on Jungle Girls, a lovely hardback showcasing the exploits of various female Tarzan-alikes. Give it a look if that sounds like your bag!
A lot’s been said about how the fairy tales of the Brothers Grimm are sometimes darker and more twisted than the sanitised versions consumed by today’s children. We all know about the mutilations that happen in the Grimms’ version of Cinderella, and some of us have dug deeper and found such oddities as Hans-My-Hedgehog or The Mouse, the Bird and the Sausage. And yes, we’ve all made thunderingly obvious puns involving “Grimm” and “grim”. Myself included, in the title of this very post, because I’m that lazy.
But there’s one story in particular I’d like to bring up; one I’ve never heard anyone talk about in the context of freaky fairy tales. That surprises me as it contains what must surely be the single most twisted moment in the entire Grimm canon. It’s called Cherry, or the Frog Bride.
Continue reading “The Grimms at their Grimmest?”